Notes
Slide Show
Outline
1
 
2
 
3
Population
4
Population
5
Population
6
Setting
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
Setting
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
Approach
18
Approach
19
Approach
20
Approach
21
"Assume that a behavior can..."
  • Assume that a behavior can serve any function(s) on any occasion
  • Design systems to both
    • Eliminate or minimize all events that may function as inadvertent rewards such as attention, escape from demands, receipt of tangible items, etc., and
    • Insure that any inadvertent rewards that cannot be removed are outweighed by a planned aversive consequence.
22
Approach
23
Approach
24
 
25
Approach
26
Approach
27
Approach
28
Approach
29
Approach
30
 
31
Approach
32
Approach
33
Approach
34
Approach
35
"Multiple,"
  • Multiple, overlapping Behavior Contracts for Not Displaying Problem Behaviors
      • Overnight
      • Transport
      • Less Than A Day
      • Multi Day
      • Daily Target (interfering behaviors)
      • Special
36
Approach
37
Approach
38
Approach
39
Approach
40
Approach
41
Approach
42
Approach
43
Approach
44
Approach
45
Approach
46
Approach
47
Approach
48
Approach
49
Approach
50
Approach
51
Approach
52
Approach
53
Approach
54
Approach
55
Approach
56
Charts showing effectiveness of adding skin shock
  • Thumbnails:  behavior frequency charts of all 36 students (no selection was exercised) who had the GED added to their positive only program between May of 2003 and May of 2005
      • Aggressive
      • Health Dangerous
      • Major Disruptive
  • Notice how infrequently adaptation to the GED occurs
57
 
58
 
59
 
60
 
61
 
62
 
63
 
64
 
65
 
66
 
67
 
68
 
69
Charts showing effectiveness of adding skin shock

Summary bar graphs
70
 
71
 
72
 
73
 
74
 
75
 
76
Difficult-to-Treat Students Who Had Been Expelled
from Programs Using Positive-Only Procedures
77
Student 1:  A.M.
78
Student 1:  A.M.
79
 
80
Student 2: B.C.
81
Student 2: B.C.
82
 
83
 
84
 
85
Student 5: M.D.
86
Student 5: M.D.
87
 
88
 
89